Janelle Monae and Kesha deliver the Grammys’ most powerful moment

Standard

Janelle Monae and Kesha deliver the Grammys’ most powerful moment

Image: Kevin Winter/Getty Images for NARAS

Janelle Monae and Kesha took to the stage at the Grammys and brought the Time’s Up movement to the front of everyone’s minds with an impassioned speech and an unforgettable, emotional performance.

Monae introduced Kesha with a poignant speech about women in the music industry and the inequality, discrimination, and harassment they face.

“To those who would dare try and silence us, we offer you two words: Time’s up,” Monae said. “We say time’s up for pay inequality, discrimination, or harassment of any kind, and the abuse of power.”

Monae set the stage for a tear-jerking performance of “Praying” by Kesha, who herself alleged abuse against her mentor and producer Dr. Luke, causing a years-long hiatus of her career.

Camila Cabello, Cyndi Lauper, Julia Michaels, Andra Day, BB Rexha, and the Resistance Revival Chorus joined Kesha on stage for a powerful performance of the artist’s autobiographical song about her years of struggling to re-enter the music industry on her own terms.

By the end of the song, tears were streaming down cheeks, including Kesha’s.

from Mashable! http://on.mash.to/2Fm80ED
via IFTTT

Hillary Clinton read ‘Fire and Fury’ at the Grammys, this is not a drill

Standard

TwitterFacebook

Was it a weird moment? Sure was. Does it matter? Nope. Hillary Clinton was there.

Clinton made a surprise appearance at the 2018 Grammys, capping off a star-studded comedy sketch featuring the likes of Cardi B, Snoop Dogg, DJ Khaled, and more. The premise? Fire and Fury spoken word auditions.

It was perfect. The assembled stars read passages from the book in their various public personas, ostensibly auditioning for the job of reading the audiobook. Clinton came in at the end, hiding her face behind the book at first (though we all knew it was her, right?).

She obviously won the job.

More about Entertainment, Music, Hillary Clinton, Fire And Fury, and Grammys 2018

from Mashable! http://on.mash.to/2DSAKaW
via IFTTT

Energy Company Hydro-Quebec Looks to Attract Bitcoin Miners

Standard

Hydro-Quebéc (HQ) is a public utility that manages the generation, transmission and distribution of electricity in Quebec, Canada, but it finds itself in a position of generating more power than its customers need.

In an article from Le Journal de Québec, Éric Martel, president and CEO of HQ, relates how HQ is facing a death spiral for electricity consumption. Power consumption by customers in the province has been stagnating since 2007, as customers are adding more and more solar panels. At the same time, HQ has been building more dams and transformers and running more lines. As HQ builds more capacity and prices rise, its customers are turning to self-serving renewables, which reduce their dependence on HQ even further.

HQ already provides electricity at extremely low rates compared to companies like Southern California Edison (SCE), for example, where prices have recently been announced as a fixed rate of $0.0319 ($0.0394 CAD) per kWh for crypto miners, compared to its general, tiered rates of $0.17 to $0.35.  

As Quebecers consume less electricity, Martel is looking to find more creative ways to attract high-energy users, like Facebook, Amazon and Microsoft. HQ is currently selling 450 MWh to computer server companies. In four years the goal is to sell 6 TWh in general and another 5 TWh for crypto mining, the equivalent of nearly two million American homes.

Francis Pouliot of the Satoshi Portal in Montreal tweeted that HQ is looking to attract enough Bitcoin miners to consume 5,000 MWh of electricity, the equivalent of four million Bitmain S9 mining servers. Between the cheap electricity and cool climate that would make temperature maintenance even less expensive, it is looking like an attractive option, but it does raise some questions.

HQ cannot simply add mining to their own business model because there are specific legal mandates that prescribe what they are allowed to do as an entity. And what about taxes? Canada has a relatively high tax rate for individuals, from 15 to 35 percent. Its corporate tax rate was comparable to the U.S. before the recently enacted U.S. tax reforms, ranging from 28 to 33 percent, thus making it important to look at the entire financial picture if considering a move to Quebec for power.

“Bitcoin mining is a crucial component of the objective of power usage in Quebec,” Pouliot told Bitcoin Magazine. “I see Quebec as the El Dorado of this new gold rush, and many people at top levels are excited about being at the forefront of this new usage of our resources. I envision a massive transfer of hash rate to Canada, and the campaigns already taking place to lure companies are seeing a lot of excitement.”

He said that there are already initiatives in the works for strategic partnerships with farmers to make use of waste heat generated by mining to heat their greenhouses. These partnerships may see results as early as next winter.

“Montreal is going to become a hub for experimentation in the recycling of waste heat,” he added.

Canada has already become an attractive option for some companies, as seen by the recent announcement from Hut8 and Bitfury. This could also be a solution for many companies in China that the government seems to be pushing to shut down. HQ appears to be making some forward-looking steps to address this very unusual problem.

from Bitcoin Magazine http://bit.ly/2DTseZ9
via IFTTT

Recommended Reading: The making of Elton John’s VR retirement party

Standard

How Elton John’s
VR retirement
announcement hit
your headset

Emma Grey Ellis,
Wired

If you haven’t heard, music legend Sir Elton John announced his retirement and final tour this week in the most 2018 way possible: VR. Wired goes behind the scenes to get the details on how that montage was made before it beamed out to your headset.

Brand new ballgame: A look at MLB’s in-house development of ‘R.B.I. Baseball 18’
Samit Sarkar, Polygon

MLB’s Advanced Media arm does a lot of things — from websites to streaming. It’s also working on a video game and Polygon has a detailed look at the development.

Spotify’s scientist: Artificial intelligence should be embraced, not feared, by the music business
Tim Ingham, Music Business Worldwide

MBW caught up with the director of Spotify’s Creator Technology Research Lab to chat about AI and how it relates to the future of the biz, including robot musicians.

Artificial intelligence is going to supercharge surveillance
James Vincent, The Verge

The Verge explains why the fact that cameras now have a brain to power their sight is huge for surveillance.

How Migos became culture
Naomi Zeichner, The Fader

If you’re not familiar with Migos, allow The Fader to provide an introduction as the group’s sophomore effort, Culture II, was released this week.

from Engadget http://engt.co/2GmNKnz
via IFTTT

A ‘Westworld’ mobile game is in the works

Standard

HBO’s version of Westworld seems tailor-made for a video game: it’s a fully-realized robot theme park with plenty of opportunities for disaster. And sure enough, you’re about to get one. In the wake of a teaser on the website of the show’s fictitious Delos Incorporated, Warner Bros. Interactive Entertainment has confirmed to Engadget that a mobile game is in development. It’s not saying much about the mechanics of the game itself, but it’s working with Dead by Daylight developer Behavior Interactive and the TV series’ Kilter Films. The title is "currently being tested in limited release," a spokesperson said.

The teaser itself may offer enough clues as it is. It describes a "Delos Park Training Simulation" that has you managing a "miniature Westworld," ranging from creating and caring for hosts (i.e. robots) to "managing guest satisfaction." Naturally, you can expect problems with robots that don’t follow the program — just hope that your park doesn’t fare as badly as the one in the show. The interface might not look exactly like that in the teaser, but it may well give you an idea of what to expect.

Via: io9

Source: Delos Incorporated

from Engadget http://engt.co/2DX2Ceg
via IFTTT

Ask Dr. NerdLove: Our Relationship Is Great, But I Can’t Stop Worrying

Standard
Image via Shutterstock.

Hello all you spectral crotch-bears, and welcome to Ask Dr. NerdLove, the only dating advice column to win the Kumite.

Normally we talk about dealing with the drama that comes with starting or being in relationships, but what about when it’s time for a relationship to end? How do you go into a relationship knowing that it may have a hard and fast end-point? Is it better to cut ties early or enjoy what you have? And what do you do when someone actually does cancel the apocalypse?

Advertisement

It’s time to use the dim mak on your troubles and doubts, and fight to survive. Let’s do this.

Hey Doc,

Bear with me here, because this story is as cliched as it gets, but there’s a few twists here. I dated a woman for three years. I loved her, I loved her family, I loved her friends, everything. We were almost perfect together. But of course we were different human beings, and we had some differences. Sexually, our chemistry was more passable than amazing, and we forged ahead knowing that. Also, we learned early on that she really wants to get married, and I’ve heard too many stories from divorced people to be on that same wavelength. We agreed that we’d have to find a therapist or something about that when the time came. The bigger divide for us was the way we used alcohol. As a musician, I kind of drink as a profession, and I haven’t really lost control of myself in over a decade. This is a quality I admire in myself and others.

Unfortunately, she was a little more susceptible. After enough alcohol was consumed, I would watch as some other personality stripped away all of the wires holding together my girlfriend as I knew her, and she’d change. There were a few instances a year where she would get so out of control it became a problem that we had to talk about the next day.

Three very nice years passed. Yes, there were some alcohol incidents here and there, but she was someone I looked forward to seeing and depended on, and she never let me down on that front. But then she got the job offer. Yup, the really good one she had been looking for the whole time. And as I’m sure you’ve already guessed, it was all the way over on the other side of the country, in a place I didn’t have the desire nor the resources to move to. I couldn’t let our relationship get in the way of her livelihood, and I was genuinely proud that she got the offer. I wanted nothing more than for her to take the job. I told her as much, and I told her not to worry about what would happen to our relationship. There was a lot of stress and pressure on her already; I wasn’t looking to bust the scales. Besides, we had a lot of fun plans in the works before her move date.

Of course, as life has taught me several times, it is difficult to carry on with a relationship as normal when you know there’s an end date in sight. Our fun plans ended up with an uncomfortable shadow over them, an elephant in the room that we were both too scared to address. We developed an odd form of emotional distance in which we were comforting one another from what we both knew was going to happen. Then, on one of our fun planned outings, the dam burst. She drank too much. The other personality emerged in full force. The drunk personality was incredibly mad at me about something and incredibly sloppy-flirty with a lot of other guys in a way that implied she had gone out by herself and was looking to leave with someone else. At this moment, all doubt left my mind that we could keep any sort of relationship going across the country.

She didn’t go home with someone else that night. She went home with me, I helped her get to the bathroom and puke and clean up and not pass out on the seat and all that fun stuff. I didn’t get mad at her. There was no point. After a certain amount of alcohol, it wasn’t my girlfriend in there anymore. And there would be no memory of the conversation the next day anyway. Unfortunately, the next day had us going directly to spending the rest of the weekend with her family, and I ended up going an entire week without revealing to her what she had done.

Finally, the moment came. We sat down and had the talk about her and the job. I said that it wasn’t going to work for us long distance, citing first and foremost what had happened the weekend before, but also our sexual chemistry and thoughts on marriage. It was not an emotion-driven speech. It was calculated and logical, a case a lawyer might present to a jury. She agreed with my points and said she didn’t want to force me to move away from where I was either. We broke things off somewhat amicably, and I set about beginning my life anew by myself for the first time in three years.

Two weeks passed. There was no communication, because I asked for there not to be. Breaking up is never an easy process, but I’ve done it enough times now that I know how to push the pain away as much as possible. But then, just before I wrote this email, I got a message from her. She got disqualified from the job. She isn’t moving. We will remain in relative physical proximity to one another, enough to theoretically continue dating. The question is, do we? I’m a bit blindsided here, as you can tell from the lengthy email. I’ve already started my new independent life, emboldened by the romantic notion of my past love that just couldn’t be. Now it turns out it could. What should I do now?

Thanks for reading,
A Blindsided Man

Not gonna lie, ABM, I’m not entirely sure what the problem is here. Your relationship was… not great, nor one that leant itself to long-term plans. You had what might be charitably called some serious foundation issues, issues that would ultimately undermine your compatibility in the long run.

Advertisement

Let’s start with the mediocre sexual chemistry. While not every relationship is going to prioritize a sexual connection — asexuals date and get happily married, after all — sexual chemistry is as reliable a predictor as you’re want to find, especially in monogamous couples. Being on the same page, sexually, is vital for the satisfaction of both partners. When one partner’s needs aren’t being met, or feels like their needs aren’t important or valued, sex becomes a breeding ground for resentment, which is relationship poison.

Then there were the long-term plans. One person wanting to get married and the other preferring not to isn’t an insurmountable problem, but it is going to be a pretty high bar to clear. That’s less of an unmet relationship goal and more of an indicator of a values mismatch. And while fundamental compatibility issues like your values can be papered over in the early years when the honeymoon phase is still within recent memory, it’s another issue that ultimately tends to drive couples apart.

But the major issue is, frankly, the booze. More than your differing views on marriage, the alcohol is the biggest indicator of the mismatch in values you had with your ex. The difference in how you approached drinking — including the number of times your ex got absolutely shit-faced — tends to be a bigger problem than most of the others. When you’ve had to have repeated conversations with your partner about what they did when they were blackout drunk, that’s generally not a good sign. Especially when she evidently caused incidents that required some form of damage control afterwards.

Despite how it can seem, alcohol isn’t a magical potion that turns your beloved Dr. Jekyll into Mrs. Hyde. It’s truth serum. Booze tends to wipe away little things like your judgement, ability to read the situation, internal filter, and your super-ego, and lets your id run wild. So when Drunk Ex comes forward with a list of grievances a mile long and starts indicating she’s willing to use somebody else’s dick to hammer you in the nuts… well, that’s a pretty good sign that Sober Ex isn’t too happy with the relationship either.

Advertisement

But hey, you had an out! She was going to move across the country and you both acknowledged that neither of you could make a long-distance relationship work. So, you preemptively ended things, letting you both move forward with your future plans as singles.

And now here you are, with your ex still living in your town instead of in the far-flung reaches of Not-My-Problemville. So what now?

Well… nothing. Y’all broke up. Your breakup may have been based around the fact that she was leaving, but that doesn’t mean that it’s contingent on her leaving. You didn’t agree to break up with conditions, after all.

Advertisement

And honestly? Even if you did? It takes two to date. It’s not as though your ex can take you to Relationship Court and argue that your breakup is no longer in effect viz Geller V. Greene.

Honestly, even if you were seeing your future singledom through the eyes of “haunted by a love that could not be”, you were happy to be single. The fact that your ex lives in the same city as you — as is true for the majority of couples — doesn’t mean that you have to get back together with her. And from what you’ve described, it seems like what worked passably well in the short-term (and three years is short term) isn’t going to work in the long term.

So my advice, ABM, is just continue as you are: a single man. The reasons you couldn’t make long distance work are the same reasons that near-distance won’t work either. The only difference is the address.

Advertisement

If the subject comes up, then just be honest with her: your relationship reached the natural end of its life. Not every love story needs to be an epic poem. Some are meant to be short stories. Some are dirty limericks. You said let go, said goodbye, and you’re ready to move on.

And if she doesn’t accept that? Well… say it again. And a third time. Nobody can force you to be in a relationship you don’t want to be in and, frankly, you seem like you don’t want to be in one with her. Take the out. You broke up. Go and find your future, knowing that your past love couldn’t be — even when she didn’t leave after all.

Good luck.

Hi Doc,

I’m in a situation that I can’t quite get my head around. Perhaps you have some advice for me?

First, a bit of background information: I’m a 24-year-old guy who’s currently doing a master’s degree in electrical engineering and before meeting my girlfriend, I didn’t have any experience with girls besides going on a couple of dates that — although nice and not awkward or anything — just didn’t have any potential to develop any further. Meeting my girlfriend a little over a year ago was therefore an incredible adventure. Of course, things have settled since, but we are still just as much in love and we are very compatible emotionally, intellectually and sexually so it’s hard to imagine that things could be better right now. In many ways our journey together feels like the perfect love story, so why am I even writing this?

Well, here’s the thing: She’s 37.

It not the age-gap itself that causes me trouble – if that would have been the case, I wouldn’t be in this relationship – it’s the fact that starting a family is going to be very tricky for us. You see, we both think that “kids would be nice, but not right now”, even though biology thinks otherwise. For now, this is fine, but I fear that when the time finally comes, she will be unable to have kids and our relationship will collapse. Compromising and getting kids earlier is not really an option as we both need some time to get our careers going (she had a delayed career start due to a lot of reasons that’s unrelated to this issue) and we potentially need to relocate and settle in a different city. My girlfriend does not worry about this as none of her friends have kids (some by choice, others because their sexual orientation prevents it) but I do since I have a tendency to plan ahead in life. I have brought up the issue with her but I haven’t mentioned the full extent of my worries as I don’t want to trigger a breakup unless there is need for one. I’m also worried that we will grow apart when I start to work as this is a quite big change in life and I’m career-wise more ambitious than her.

As you might have noticed, all of our problems, both potential and near-certain, are in the future and things are really good right now. Lately I’ve started thinking that I’m perhaps just overthinking all of this and that I maybe should just enjoy the ride and see where it takes me.

I mean, the worst thing that could happen is that things we have to break-up in five years or so due to the above-mentioned factors, but at the same time I feel that it would like robbing the last fertile years from my girlfriend for my own enjoyment. I should perhaps also mention that I’m not in any way afraid of leaving if I have to, but this relationship is extremely valuable to me and I will only break up when there are no other options.

So what do you think, doc? Should I save ourselves from a bigger problem in the future or enjoy this trip while it lasts?

Living On The Edge of A Broken Heart

“Lately I’ve started thinking that I’m perhaps just overthinking all of this “

Ya think?

Congratulations, LOTEABH. You, like many nerds, have the worst super power in the world: the ability to find every possible Worst Case Scenario. You have What-If Vision. What if you decide you want kids when it’s too late? What if your job pulls you apart? What if the world is about to erupt into a ball of atomic fire because somebody started a war on Twitter?

Advertisement

My dude, you are doing something that I see so many people do: you’re borrowing trouble from the future. If the X-Men have taught us anything, is that the future you’re expecting may well not exist.

Your visions of a relationshipocalypse are based on these dire predictions that you’ve played out in your head. But unless you’ve managed to build some sort of time window, those are all speculation, not reality. (And if you have built a time window, let’s talk Powerball numbers.)

The big sticking point here is the question of children. Once the two of you are in a place where having kids won’t derail your other dreams, will it be too late? Sure… if you didn’t have literally hundreds of options available to you to solve the problem. If you’re sure you both will definitely positively want kids in 5, 10 years, she could freeze some eggs. You could make plans now to adopt children — domestic adoption is a process that can take 5 years. You could adopt overseas. You could look into surrogacy. You could become foster parents.

Advertisement

The fact is that while yours are legitimate concerns, they’re solvable. But you’re far more focused on all the reasons why this could break you two up. So now you’re focused on this horrifying potential future instead of, y’know, just enjoying what you have now.

And hey, my dude, I’m here from the future to tell you: every relationship you ever have might end in you two splitting up. In fact, every relationship you will have in the future will end… right up until one doesn’t. And here’s the thing: you will never know which one that will be.

Advertisement

But just as importantly, the fact that one of you didn’t die in the saddle doesn’t mean that your relationship was a failure or that it wasn’t valuable or important or meaningful. If your relationship ends because of children or job stresses and not because one of you died of old age or consumption while singing a heartbreaking aria doesn’t mean that your relationship was any less important. It just means that, like A Blindsided Man above you, your relationship came to the end of its natural life and that’s ok.

The only real problem here, LOTEABH, is the fact that you’re wasting your time right now. You have an amazing relationship with someone you love madly. The time you spend worrying about what might happen is time that would be better spent savoring what you do have. Your prognostications aside, you literally have no idea how long you and your sweetie have together. You may only have a few months. You may have a lifetime. But the time you spend gaming out the end of things is time you will never get back with her.

And no matter how much time you have together… wouldn’t you rather spend it with her in the here and now instead of focused on theoretical futures? I mean, I know what I’d choose. And I suspect it’s what you’d rather have, too.

Advertisement

Let the future take care of itself. The problems that will come, will come no matter how much you worry about them ahead of time. Enjoy what you have now. As the sage once said: just one year of love is better than a lifetime alone.

Good luck.


Did your break-up get cancelled unexpectedly? Have you had to navigate long-term conflicts in your relationship? Share your thoughts and experiences in the comments. We’ll be back with more of your questions in two weeks.


Ask Dr. Nerdlove is Kotaku’s bi-weekly dating column, hosted by the one and only Harris O’Malley, AKA Dr. NerdLove. Got a question you’d like answered? Write doc@doctornerdlove.com and put “Kotaku” in the subject line.

Advertisement

Harris O’Malley is a writer and dating coach who provides geek dating advice at his blogPaging Dr. NerdLove and the Dr. NerdLove podcast. His new dating guide New Game+: The Geek’s Guide to Love, Sex and Dating is out now from Amazon, iTunes and everywhere fine books are sold He is also a regular guest at One Of Us.

He can be found dispensing snark and advice on Facebook and on Twitter at @DrNerdLove.

from Lifehacker http://bit.ly/2BzkG8X
via IFTTT