The NASA astronaut whose DNA changed after a year in space talks about his underachieving childhood, his identical twin and fellow astronaut brother, and how leaving Earth changes people for the better


Scott Kelly

  • Retired NASA astronaut Scott Kelly had four missions in space, including a 340-day trip aboard the International Space Station in 2015-2016.
  • On our "Success" podcast, he describes himself as a distracted kid who figured out his life later than his identical twin brother Mark, who also became an astronaut.
  • He shared some of his best moments in space, like seeing the entirety of planet Earth, as well as the worst, being helpless when his sister-in-law Gabrielle Giffords was shot in 2011.

When Scott Kelly talks about flying into space, he sounds like a guy talking about his favorite hobby, with the same tone someone would use for golf or fishing.

As a NASA astronaut, Kelly made four trips to space, including spending 340 days onboard the International Space Station. Meanwhile, his identical twin brother — and fellow astronaut — Mark was on Earth. Since then, scientists have been watching how differently the two have aged. In March, they said that Kelly’s DNA had changed by 7% following his year-long trip.

Since retiring in 2016, Kelly wrote a memoir last year about his year in space called "Endurance," and he’s become an advocate for improving science and math education in the United States.

In our conversation, Business Insider talked with Kelly about what he saw in space, what he missed back on Earth, and how he went from a kid who couldn’t focus into one of the most celebrated astronauts of our time.

Listen to the full episode here:

Subscribe to "Success! How I Did It" on Apple Podcasts, Google Play, or your favorite podcast app. Check out previous episodes with:

The following transcript has been edited for clarity.

Richard Feloni: Scott, thank you for being here.

Scott Kelly: My pleasure.

scott kelly selfie

Feloni: Just over two years ago you came back from a 340-day trip aboard the International Space Station. What was that even like? How do you begin to process that at this point?

Kelly: First thing is it’s a privilege, but, you know, a year is a long time to be anywhere. But it was a great experience, I mean the highlight of my professional career. And I think it’s important what we’re doing there, on the International Space Station.

Feloni: When you’re aboard there for so long, did you have struggles with trying to stay sane?

Kelly: You know, I was lucky that I had previously flown a flight that was 159 days, so I kind of knew what I was getting into. And being the first American to spend that time in space, I didn’t have a whole lot of people that had a similar experience to talk to about it, so I went into this with my own preconceived notion of what it would be like. I think I gave it enough thought and a had a good plan, that when I got to the end, I didn’t feel like I was just climbing the walls to get out of there.

international space station, iss

Feloni: You didn’t feel like you had to escape.

Kelly: No, I think I handled it. My goal was that when I got back, I wanted for the flight director that I had in the beginning of the flight to talk to the flight director at the end of the mission. For the two of them, when they shared notes on their experience working with me in space, that they had the same exact comments on how I was as a crew member.

Twin brothers, fellow astronauts

Mark Kelly and Scott Kelly

Feloni: Your identical twin brother Mark is also an astronaut. What dynamic did you guys have, growing up in New Jersey?

Kelly: So between each other, we were either like the best of friends or the worst of enemies. And we would like beat each other’s brains out until we were about 15, and then I realized that was pointless.

We came from a middle-class family — both our parents were police officers. They gave us a very long leash, which I think is a good thing and a bad thing. But somehow we managed to survive and later, both had the privilege of flying in space four times.

Feloni: Did you guys have a sibling rivalry, or is it more you want to do the same things together?

scott kelly mark kelly as kidsKelly: Yeah, I think it was more having the same genetics and being exposed to the same things growing up. We happened to have the same interests later. And it wasn’t that we were in competition with each other, it was more — I think we’re competitive people, but not really with each other.

Feloni: And so Mark, he figured out where he wanted to take his career before you did, right?

Kelly: I was this kid that could not pay attention. Was not a good student. Always wondering how in the ninth grade my brother went from being like me to getting straight A’s — I never knew how that happened.

But apparently, what he tells me, is that our dad sat us down in like the eighth grade, and said, "Hey, guys. You know, you’re not good students, not college material. We’re going to start thinking about a vocational education for you." And my brother thought, "Whoa! I want to go to college and do something more."

I, on the other hand, had no recollection whatsoever of this conversation. Probably only because there was like a squirrel running outside the window and I was like, "Squirrel!" Otherwise, I probably would have been a straight-A student, too.

How a book inspired him to do something with his life

Feloni: When you were 18 you had like a pivotal moment thought, right, you read Tom Wolfe’s book. Can you explain that?

Kelly: Yeah, I read "The Right Stuff." Happened to find it by accident in college, in the bookstore, and picked it up. It was the spark I needed to motivate me to do more with my life than I was currently doing.

Feloni: So this was a book about military test pilots who ended up becoming the first American astronauts. Did you see yourself in them?

the right stuff

Kelly: Well, you know, I read this book, and I could relate to a lot of the characteristics these guys had, with regards to their personalities, their risk-taking, their leadership abilities, ability to work as a team. That made me think.

I related to a lot of those characteristics with one exception, and that is I wasn’t a good student, especially in science and math. And I thought, "Wow, you know, if I could fix just that thing, then I could maybe be like these guys."

At the time I was thinking you’ve got to be really smart to be an engineer or scientist. What I realized is really what it takes is just hard work, and it’s not any particular gift you might have.

As a student, it’s just really hard, especially at first, when you don’t have the habit-patterns to study and pay attention. But once I got over that, I was able to go from a kid at 18 years old that was always like a very average, underperforming student and then fast forward almost to the day 18 years later, I flew in space for the first time. It was a pretty remarkable comeback, I think.

Feloni: And so looking at your own, kind of evolution as a student — is that weighing in on your advocacy now, for science education?

Kelly: Oh, absolutely. So 3M did this study, the "State of Science Index," that did a poll of 14 different countries and people’s opinions about science and the importance of science, and how much it affects their daily lives. It focuses on kids and getting kids the science education they need.

And one of the things they learned is that a lot of people think that to be a scientist or to work in a science field you have to be a genius. I’m the perfect example of this kid that was bad at science and math — I was actually bad at all of the subjects — and prove that, well, you don’t have to be a genius. What it takes is some hard work. But also it takes an awareness that you don’t have to be the smartest kid in the class to work in a science field, and I think to get kids interested, that’s important.

It’s also important to show them the importance of science and how it can change the world. We have a huge challenge ahead of us. In the next 30 years the population of the Earth is going to increase to nine billion people. The challenges that we face with that ever-increasing population with regards to climate change, food and water availability, sustainability — those problems are going to be solved by science, and they’re going to be solved by the kids today.

Feloni: So what would you tell the kids today who were like you, and they don’t like school?

Kelly: I hated school, and I learned to like it. And if you find the thing that inspires you to learn, you can do it. If I could do it, you can do it. And there’s so many important fields out there that are science-related right now that will help change the world, and they can be a part of it. Absolutely — if I could do what I did, they can do it.

scott kelly plane

Feloni: When did you tell your brother that you wanted to be an astronaut, too?

Kelly: You know, we never actually talked about it. We were both test pilots in the Navy. And test pilots at that time, when the space shuttle was flying, most of them would apply to become astronauts, and we did, too. He actually interviewed before I did, so I thought he was going to get an interview and maybe have a chance to become an astronaut and I would never get called. I just didn’t think I was really prepared.

But I was willing to take the risk of rejection, send in an application — which I think a lot of people don’t like to do that for some reason, but I didn’t care.

Feloni: Did you guys motivate each other?

Kelly: No, not really. Like I said, I think we’re competitive in nature, but not with each other. We’re pretty supportive of each other.

Feloni: Actually, ahead of your last flight, he broke protocol and got on the bus, to meet you before you got on board.

Kelly: Yes, he was there actually every time I flew in space. But the last two times the Russian space program, very nice of them, let him get on the bus — despite us being quarantined — and ride out to the rocket, as I got in.

Feloni: So having this same career path has allowed you to be closer than ever?

Kelly: Yeah, I’ll tell you what: Flying in space is a privilege, and even more so when you can share that experience with this person that I’ve known my whole life.

Getting addicted to flying into space

Scott Kelly space suit

Feloni: How old were you when you first went into space, and what was that experience like?

Kelly: I flew my first time in December 1999, when I was 36 years old — which is actually pretty young for an astronaut to fly in space for the first time — and it was an incredible experience.

I tried to describe to my brother, who was also a test pilot — we had the same astronaut training, I just happened to fly in space about two years before he did — and I tried to explain to him for a couple year, "Hey, this is what this is like. This is what to expect." When he got off the space shuttle, I was there waiting at the hatch, the first thing he said to me when he got off was, "I had no idea what that launch was going to be like."

I mean, it is seven million pounds of thrust, and it hits you instantaneously. You recognize that the vehicle itself weighs five million pounds. You know you are just part of this controlled explosion, basically, and you’re on the top of it, and it is launching you. You’re busting a hole through the atmosphere at impossible speeds.

It really is an incredible experience. I wish I could do it again. I wish I could do it every day.

Feloni: Really?

space shuttleKelly: Oh yeah, amazing, launching on a rocket. It’s the funnest —

Feloni: That you’re favorite part of the whole thing?

Kelly: Yeah, launching, coming back, spacewalks — those are all very similar in their appeal.

Feloni: With Mark, like no matter what you could do to explain the experience , it wasn’t going to capture it.

Kelly: Yeah, if I couldn’t explain it to him, it’s kind of hard to put it into words to other people that don’t have a similar background and understanding of the space program.

Feloni: I know it’s difficult to explain, but what goes through your head when you see all of planet Earth from space?

Kelly: A few things. The planet is incredibly beautiful, breathtakingly beautiful. Having said that, parts of it are polluted, like with constant levels of pollution in certain parts of Asia.

You see how fragile the atmosphere looks. It’s very thin. It’s almost like a thin contact lens over somebody’s eye, and you realized all the pollutants we put into the atmosphere are contained in that very thin film over the surface. It’s a little bit scary actually to look at it.

earth atmosphere

And then you realize looking at the Earth, that despite its beauty and its tranquility, there’s a lot of hardship and conflict that goes on. You look at the planet without borders, especially during the day. At night you can see countries with lights, but during the daytime it looks like we are all part of one spaceship, Spaceship Earth.

And we’re all flying through space together, as a team, and it gives you this perspective — people have described it as this "orbital perspective" — on humanity, and you get this feeling that we just need to work better — much, much better — to solve our common problems.

Feloni: Did it change your perspective as an individual?

Kelly: Oh, absolutely. I think it makes you a more empathetic person. More in touch with humanity and who we are, and what we should do to not only to take care of the planet but also to solve our common problems, which clearly are many.

Part of that science survey is identifying, "Hey, these are things that we can do to improve our chances as we continue to go forward through time, to having a sustainable planet, and to deal with the challenges ahead."

Coping with the difficulties of floating above the planet

Feloni: You’ve said that of all the things that could go wrong, the biggest fear for you was that something bad would happen to your family.

Kelly: Yeah. You can’t come home. I experienced that on the flight prior to my last one. And that was my sister-in-law, congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords, was shot in Tucson, Arizona. Six people killed in this shooting, and I was halfway through a mission and couldn’t come back.

gabby giffords mark kellySo when I was going into space for a year, my big concern is if something happens to my family members, dealing with them. And that concerns me the most, much more than my personal safety.

Feloni: So when that happened during that previous mission, did it feel like, "This is my worst fear coming true?"

Kelly: Yeah, Gabby getting shot was a significant event.

Feloni: What ran through your head?

Kelly: "I wish I could be home to support my family, but I can’t, and I recognize that." I mean, that’s part of when you go into space for a long periods of time, you’re signing up for that.

My worst possible fear would be something happening to [my fiancée] Amiko or my kids. You cannot be physically there for them.

Feloni: Do you miss the physical presence of having your family there? Did it ever become something that you really just missed?

Kelly: You know, on the space station, we have an extraordinary ability to stay connected to people on Earth. We have email, we have a phone that works most of the time, video conferences.

You look out the window, Earth is pretty close, so there is a very good way to stay connected with folks. So even though you’re in space, you still don’t feel like you’re really, really far away.

You understand the physics, so in a practical sense you’re really far away, but in a visual sense you’re relatively close. Which, when we go to Mars someday it’s gonna be a much different experience.

Feloni: Why?

scott kelly texans

Kelly: Well, because in a few days you’re gonna lose the ability to have a phone conversation because of the time delays. You’re not going to be able to look out the window and see your home. I mean, I could get a long lens, and a pair of binoculars, and I could see my house from space, which you know, pretty soon, on the way to Mars, the planet’s basically gonna look like a star at some point. So I think people feel much more isolated on those kind of trips.

Feloni: So it’s kind of tricking yourself into thinking that ‘I’m closer than I actually am’?

Kelly: Yeah, absolutely. But then again, you’re flying at 17,500 miles per hours, it’s not like you can just open a hatch and jump out with a parachute and be home.

The politics of space

scott kelly us russia

Feloni: You’ve said like how remarkable it felt as someone who was trained during the Cold War to be cooperating with Russian cosmonauts on your mission. What do you think of the revival of tensions with Russia?

Kelly: Well, we were in a Cold War with the former Soviet Union, and tensions with Russia occur, from time to time. My personal experience working with Russians in the space program, and my other friends in Russia, even some of them that had nothing to do with the space program, they’ve always been very, very generous people. Great friends.

We’ve had a great partnership with them, with the International Space Station. And that’s one of the great things about the space station, it’s an international space station — different countries, cultures, languages. And that is one of the things that makes this such an extraordinary accomplishment, is the international part of it.

So I understand that at times we can be in conflict, hopefully that won’t always be the case, but we should also look to the International Space Station as an example of things that we can do together in a positive way.

Feloni: And what do you think of the current private space race, and how that interacts with government space programs?

falcon 9 rocket launch koreasat 5a spacex flickr 38056454431_706e1e5a68_kKelly: You know, I think that people have a different perception of what private spaceflight, privatization, means. I think it means something different to everyone.

People often look at a company like SpaceX, a private entity that is doing some incredible things in space, and I think sometimes they don’t recognize that for some of what SpaceX does, NASA’s in partnership with them, supports them.

Feloni: So they’re allies?

Kelly: Yeah, we’re cooperating with SpaceX.

This is not the first time that private industry has been involved in the space program. Even if you look to the Space Shuttle, Rockwell built it, not NASA. NASA was involved in design, managing, and construction. So private space exploration, private space flight is not something new, but the way we’re doing it, managing it, is different.

We’re giving SpaceX some requirements and then letting them figure out how to do it, so it’s a little different than the traditional way we have done things. But it’s great, because maybe they can do things cheaper, and allow NASA to save money and resources to go and fly to Mars some day.

Why he thinks if he can do it, anyone can

scott kelly international space station

Feloni: And what would you tell a young person who’s considering going into space?

Kelly: What I tell them is if you want to be a NASA astronaut, make sure you know what the minimum qualifications are (and that is generally a bachelor’s degree in science or engineering or math) but then choose a field you like. Because if you like it you’re going to do better at it, and NASA likes people that have done good in their current careers because that’s a very good indication of how they will do in a new one.

scott kelly gardening space

But then also be a well-rounded person able to do other things. On the space station, you’re not just the commander or the scientist, you’re the plumber, you’re the electrician, you’re the IT person, you’re the doctor, you’re the dentist.

Feloni: So you have to do everything all at once?

Kelly: You’re the garbage man, you’re the janitor! I mean you do everything, so they want people that have all these different skills and abilities to do other things, and work well together as a team. Because that’s what makes a good crew member. Even that’s what makes a good teammate on Earth — people that are willing to help out when required.

Feloni: Are you hopeful for our future in space?

Kelly: I hope I can fly in space again, with all of you. Yeah, I’m very hopeful. I think it’s a privilege to do it, and I think it changes people for the better, having that experience. It’s exciting, it’s fun, and some day there will be more people flying in space. Hopefully it will be like getting on an airplane. It will happen some day, it’s just a matter of when.

Feloni: Great. Well, thank you Scott.

Kelly: Oh, my pleasure.

SEE ALSO: The 32-year-old who sold his first company for $80 million and a second for $2 billion talks about writing to Richard Branson, how he’s a terrible employee, and why he never intends to build companies to sell them

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: What would happen if humans tried to land on Jupiter

from SAI

New Study Finds Your Bottled Water May Have Particles Of Plastic In It


water bottle


A new study found that bottled water has tiny particles of plastic in it. Plastic that you are drinking, which could be hazardous to your health. A non-profit journalism organization called Orb Media revealed that a “person who drinks a liter of bottled water a day might be consuming tens of thousands of microplastic particles each year.” Mmmm plastic.

The study, the largest of its kind, was conducted at the State University of New York where they examined more than 250 bottles from 11 different brands that are sold in nine different countries. The study discovered tiny bits of plastic, known as microplastics, in bottles of water. The research stated that 93% of the bottled water had microplastics inside, including some of the biggest water brands in the world such as Aqua, Aquafina, Dasani, Evian, and Nestle Pure, San Pellegrino. The study found that 65% of the plastic particles were “fragments” of plastic, including from bottle caps.

The results found an average of 10.4 particles of plastic per liter, which is twice the amount of microparticles found in tap water. The contamination included polypropylene, nylon, and polyethylene terephthalate. German bottler Gerolsteiner said their own tests showed “significantly” lower qualities of microparticles per liter. Nestle’s tested six bottles from three different locations and found between zero to five plastic microparticles per liter.

Coca-Cola, who produces Dasani water, released a statement: “We have some of the most stringent quality standards in the industry, and the water we use in our drinks is subject to multi-step filtration processes prior to production. As Orb Media’s own reporting has shown, microscopic plastic fibers appear to be ubiquitous, and therefore may be found at minute levels even in highly treated products. We stand by the safety of our products, and welcome continued study of plastics in our environment.” Other manufacturers declined to participate in the study.

So will these microparticles kill you? Nobody knows. There are some who believe that plastic particles ingest might be absorbed into our organs, such as the liver and kidneys. Any toxins in the body are generally hazardous to your health. The World Health Organization is now launching its own study into the potential risks of microplastic contamination in water bottles.

If you thought you could escape the plastic particles by drinking from a glass bottle, we’ve got some bad news. “The study mostly focused on plastic bottles, but one batch of glass ones were checked for comparison. It turns out that the glass ones have microplastics too,” Andrew Mayes, the University of East Anglia biochemistry lecturer who developed the particle-spotting technique used in this research, told Fortune. Guess we have no choice but to drink beer from cans from now on. You know, just to be safe.



This video claiming ink cartridges are a scam is going massively viral


It’s a well known fact that printers are probably the most annoying piece of technology in the world.

No one likes them. They’re confusing, they go wrong all the time, and despite the fact everything else is becoming more user friendly — phones; cars; computers — printers seem to be woefully anchored in the past.

Well, YouTuber Gregory Austin McConnell is angry about this too. Very angry.

On Thursday, he published a video titled “Ink Cartridges Are A Scam”. At the time of writing it’s already racked up around 300,000 views, and it’s sitting high on the top page of Reddit’s r/videos sub.

The 12 minute video starts with McConnell talking about his time working at a tech support call centre. He claims he had access to the manufacturing price for different products during his time there.

“At the bottom of my screen I catch a glimpse of replacement ink cartridges and my jaw drops,” McConnell says. 

“We were selling packages of standard capacity multi-color ink cartridges for $59.95. And the cost of manufacturing? $0.23.”

McConnell focuses the rest of his video on Inkjet printers and all the ways be believes the companies behind those printers are trying to scam customers.

“The line that we’re fed is simple,” says McConnell. “‘Ink cartridges are expensive because ink technology is expensive.'”

Despite HP spending $1 billion annually on ink research and development, though, he argues that very little is actually improving.

Running out of ink

For a big chunk of the video, McConnell talks about the methods printer companies use to get money out of the customer — all of which apparently revolve around getting them to replace their ink cartridges more regularly.

The methods he refers to include:

– The ink cartridge chip telling the printer to stop working as soon as one color has run out (even if the other colors are still full)

– The ink cartridge chip sending “false low ink notifications” to your printer

– Blocking customers from refilling cartridges with their own ink or making their own repairs

– Printers using the color cyan even when printing in just black and white

One thing he doesn’t mention, but which has been reported on before, is how the volume of ink in printer cartridges has also shrunk over time — something that’s covered extensively in this Guardian article.

To round the whole thing off, McConnell shares a story that will be horribly familiar to many people — the nightmare of trying to fix his mom’s printer.

Judging by the fact the video ends with him smashing up a printer with a sledgehammer, you can probably tell how that went.

Mashable has reached out to HP for comment.

from Mashable!

Cigarettes Should Be Illegal 


I got an email this morning from the FDA that contained this bummer of a statement: “[C]igarettes are the only legal consumer product that, when used as intended, will kill half of all long-term users.”

It’s not news, but it’s true.

If somebody invented cigarettes today, I hope that we would all laugh their makers off the internet and get them in trouble with, I dunno, the FDA or something. A thing you burn, that creates annoying smoke, and will kill you if you keep using it? And it’s addictive, designed to make you want to keep using it? There is no reason for cigarettes to be legal. Maybe you don’t like the government telling you what to do, but currently the cigarette companies are the ones telling you what to do.


Specifically, they are telling you that it is a-ok, even cool, to light some carcinogens on fire and inhale the smoke. As a bonus, you’re messing with the lungs and brains of people who come near you. Why the hell would you want to do that?

The FDA is very, very belatedly dealing with the situation (how long have we known cigarettes are useless death sticks?) and have chosen an oblique way. The FDA announced last year that they have the authority to regulate the level of nicotine in cigarettes, and they intend to set a limit that is below the level of what’s addictive. If you have opinions on this, great! They recently opened up a docket for public comments.

If this goes forward, you won’t even have the excuse that you’re smoking because you’re addicted. You will literally be filling your lungs with garbage smoke for no reason. Good luck to the tobacco companies, who will probably still find a way to market the heck out of this.

from Lifehacker

Marques Brownlee, ‘the best technology reviewer on the planet,’ talks about the past four years and his plans beyond YouTube


marques brownlee mkbhd

In 2014, I met a 20-year-old named Marques Brownlee, who former Google VP Vic Gundotra once called "the best technology reviewer on the planet."

Four years later, Brownlee is now 24, and his YouTube channel, "MKBHD," has grown exponentially:

– In 2014, Brownlee had 1.5 million YouTube subscribers and nearly 130 million total views on 640+ YouTube videos.

– As of March 15, 2018, Brownlee has 5.9 million YouTube subscribers and over 860 million total views on 997 total YouTube videos

You’re reading that right: Brownlee has produced nearly 1,000 YouTube videos over the last nine years, including tutorials, reviews, interviews, impressions, and explainers, all built with the singular purpose of helping anyone and everyone navigate the constantly-evolving world of consumer technology. And in a recent phone conversation, Brownlee told Business Insider he feels he’s just getting started.

"As far as the video production side, I’m still learning so much of that," Brownlee said.

Below is a lightly-edited transcript of my conversation with Brownlee, in which he talked about what it’s been like making YouTube videos over the past four years, and how he sees himself expanding beyond YouTube:

SEE ALSO: Meet ‘the best technology reviewer on the planet,’ who is only 20 years old

DAVE SMITH: Last time we talked was four years ago, which is long time in technology years and certainly YouTube years. You were working out of your dorm room in Stevens College back then. What’s your setup like now?

MARQUES BROWNLEE: We relocated, so basically everything is in a studio environment now, which facilitates video shooting obviously. It makes it a lot easier to have more space. But as far as a lot of the tech goes, it’s actually a lot of the same stuff. The desk is still exactly the same desk I was using in my apartment, the speakers are the same — it’s just all scaled up. The hard drives we need and the cameras we use are different, but it’s just growing from that exact setup from my apartment.

SMITH: How much space are you working with now compared to what you had before?

BROWNLEE: The room in the apartment was a couple hundred square feet at most, but the studio space is around 3,000 square feet, which gives us more room for us to mess with things like lighting, depths of field, framing, and building different sets for different purposes and videos. It’s been pretty great so far. I originally was looking to move out of my apartment into a bigger apartment that would have more space for me to build video stuff, but I ended up just moving and having a separation of where I work and where I live, and we found some studio space in New Jersey. It’s a blank slate for us.

SMITH: Over the last four years, what have you noticed about the kinds of tech your audience responds to?

BROWNLEE: I think one thing I’m able to notice more that I didn’t really have access to before is the bleeding edge of tech. There’s still the classic reviews of smartphones, tablets, people making a purchase decision — that’s still the core of the content, for sure. But then there’s also the “dope tech,” the crazy bleeding-edge stuff that most people don’t have access to, or don’t even get to see or experience for the most part.

Just being a window into that world has been really exciting. There have been companies reaching out and more than willing to offer a look at their tech, or a demo of something that may come to market eventually, or a prototype — fun stuff like that. That’s something I never really got to do before, but now that they’re willing to reach out to the audience that watches these videos, we get to have a little more fun that way as well.

SMITH: When you say “we” and “us” — who is your team these days?

BROWNLEE: For the last year — roughly, about 12 months — it’s been the two of us: Me and Andrew [Manganelli], my friend who’s been on full-time helping with production and logistics and management. Having two sets of hands and two brains to work on stuff has been really helpful.

SMITH: When did he join the team?

BROWNLEE: We’d been friends before because of Ultimate Frisbee, but he joined the team after CES last year, so January 2017.

SMITH: With adding Andrew, has your process changed at all?

BROWNLEE: The only thing that’s really changed is the actual shooting of the videos, but the process of deciding what tech to review, or listening to the audience, or interactions, has mostly stayed the same, which I think is good. There’s still a direct connection between people commenting on the videos and me reading them, so the extra hands come into play when it’s just more about making better videos or more videos in the same amount of time.

See the rest of the story at Business Insider

from SAI